Rule 52 guide
ChatGPT workplace policy for employees using AI before the rules are written. Set practical AI rules for everyday staff use without turning it into a six-month policy project.
Most workplaces do not have a single AI problem. They have a collection of everyday use cases: drafting, summarizing, meeting notes, spreadsheet help, email polish, client materials, and internal analysis. A ChatGPT policy should cover those real behaviors.
What staff need to know
What staff need to know
- Which tools are allowed or under review.
- What information must not be pasted into public tools.
- When AI-assisted work must be reviewed before sharing.
- Who owns approval for new or recurring use cases.
- What to do when AI output may affect clients, employees, finances, legal obligations, health information, or public claims.
Common mistake
Common mistake
- Many organizations write a broad AI statement and stop there. Staff still need simple rules for daily use. Managers need a review checklist. Leadership needs an approval path for new tools and workflows.
How Rule 52 handles it
How Rule 52 handles it
- Rule 52 generates an AI use policy, staff-facing rules, review checklist, approval form, acknowledgment form, and rollout language from one guided intake. Pro adds risk and inventory records for teams that need a stronger operating layer.
Recommended next step
Generate the documents, then review and adopt them.
Rule 52 creates editable business-control materials for AI use. It does not replace legal, cybersecurity, privacy, clinical, tax, or compliance review. Regulated or high-risk organizations should have qualified professionals review before adoption.